1. Nasser: Emergence of Authoritarian states

In 1952 a military coup, also known as the Egyptian Revolution brought down the monarch, King Farouk. The coup was led by the Free Officers Movement, a group of army officers led by Mohammed Naguib and Gamal Abdel Nasser (see photo). However, Nasser was the real power behind the coup and had established himself as President of Egypt by 1954.
Theme One: Emergence of Authoritarian states
1. What was the context of Nasser’s ‘revolution’ in Egypt?
- Economic factors
- Political factors
- Foreign policy factors
2. What were the short term factors leading to the establishment of an authoritarian state?
3. How was Nasser able to establish control?
Starter:
Watch the first two minutes of this video as an introduction to Nasser and the context of his rule:
What was the context of Nasser’s ‘revolution’ in Egypt?
‘After two and a half thousand years of taking orders successively from Persian, Greek, Roman, Byzantine, Arab, Kurdish, Turkish, French and British pro-consuls, the people of Egypt were at long last to regain their national statehood.’
Anthony Nutting. Nasser. 1972.

Starter: What can you learn from these maps regarding the significance of the Suez Canal?
Before 1882 Egypt was nominally under the control of the Ottoman Empire, though day to day running was through the Muhammad Ali dynasty. It was granted the status of an autonomous vassal state or Khedivate in 1867, a status which was to remain in place until 1914.
The Suez Canal, built in partnership with the French, was completed in 1869. Other rapid infrastructural changes also emerged at this point – railroads, telegraphs, harbours, schools and land irrigation projects were built and a dramatic expansion of the export economy began.
However, this modernisation of Egypt meant that Egypt was in debt to European banks. In 1875 Ismail was forced to sell Egypt’s share in the canal to the British government. As the rest of the shares were owned by the French, European influence was strong in the country.
As the country faced economic collapse in 1876, European financiers took control of the Suez Canal in return for writing off debt and advised the regime to cut spending on the Egyptian military. In response there was a large military demonstration in September 1881 which demanded the removal of the prime minister and for the Khedive Tewfiq to rule by decree. As the crisis threatened European property and interests, the British and French sent warships to Alexandria in April 1882. There was widespread fear of a foreign invasion and Egyptian army officers moved to take control; Anglo-French actions had fuelled Islamic and nationalist sentiments. By June, a new revolutionary government was in control and began to nationalise key assets. Concerned about the Suez Canal, a combined Anglo-Indian-French force invaded to seize control of the canal. In September this combined force defeated Egyptian forces at Tel El Kebir and put Tawfiq back in power.
From now on the British were now ostensibly in control and this was to contribute to growing nationalism and the events of 1952 (see below)
1. What were the long-term economic factors that led to the emergence of an authoritarian state in Egypt?
Despite the modernisation that had taken place in Egypt in the 19th Century, the gap between rich and poor in Egypt was extreme and the majority of the population lived in poverty. The cost of modernisation meant onerous taxation on ordinary people which caused popular discontent
The British administrator, Lord Cromer new that for political stability, there had to be economic stability. He thus oversaw the implementation of a program of investment in agriculture – most significantly in cotton. In addition, attempts were made to improve the Nile’s irrigation system; large projects such as the Aswan Dam were planned and more canals were built. The reforms were designed to eliminate the debt left by the Ottoman khedival regime.However, it was mainly the upper and middle classes in Egypt that benefitted from the reforms and stark economic inequality continued. In agriculture, just 6% of landowners owned 65% of land. The annual wage in Egyptian pounds for a farmer was £22 and a landless seasonal labourer was just £7. Peasants would migrate to the cities in an attempt to escape the grinding poverty, but due to a lack of housing and work, they lived in sprawling overcrowded slums along with the city workers. Indeed, conditions for urban workers were appalling. Trade unions were either controlled by the government or banned, and workers had no tangible rights. British imperial policies exacerbated these economic issues in Egypt which then was significantly impacted by the global Great Depression of the 1930s. Indeed, Historian Robert Stephens suggests that in the first half of the 20th century conditions in Egypt were comparable to pre-revolutionary France.
Short-term economic factors
During the Second World War there was an increased demand for Egyptian goods which led to some improvement in wages. However, after 1945 the economy slumped and unemployment increased. The government was plunged into debt again, with a balance of payments deficit of £38 million and a budget deficit of £81 million by 1952. Part of the reason King Farouk presented himself as ‘king of all the Arabs’ was to distract from domestic economic issues.
Task One
ATL: Thinking and communication skills
In pairs draft a report summarising the economic problems facing Egypt in the first half of the 20th century to be presented to a UN committee. Include in your findings a discussion of how these economic issues may lead to increased political tensions within the country.
2. How did the weakness of Egypt’s political system foster the emergence of an authoritarian state?
Long-term
In 1914, when the Ottomans joined the First World War on the side of the Central Powers - Britain established a protectorate in Egypt. The ruling khedive was removed and replaced with Hussein Kamel who, in December 1914, was made to declare himself Sultan of Egypt and independent of the Ottomans. Germany had supported Egyptian nationalists against the British before the war, and this continued during the First World War.
At the end of the First World War, with the defeat of the Ottomans and the declaration of US president Woodrow Wilson’s 14 points, Egyptian nationalism was galvanised. Indeed, number five of the 14 points stated that the US aimed for: ‘An absolutely impartial adjustment of all colonial claims, based upon a strict observance of the principle that in determining all such questions of sovereignty the interests of the populations concerned must have equal weight with the equitable claims of the government whose title is to be determined’. Nationalists therefore hoped to gain total independence from Britain.
Indeed, the origins of the nationalist Wafd party can be found in the delegation of Egyptian nationalists that went to the post-war Paris Peace conference with the hope of arguing the case for independence. The name Wafd was from the term al-wafd al-misry which meant ‘Egyptian delegation’.
The nationalist leader who would lead this delegation, Saad Zaghlul, was arrested by the British in March 1919 and exiled to Malta. German backed nationalists organised mass demonstrations which developed into the ‘1919 Revolution’. Anti-British sentiments united the population, and student protests were followed by a national general strike which paralysed the country. In the countryside there was also widespread violence, railway lines were wrecked and British troops and civilians were killed. To crush the rising, General Bulfin sent in brutal ‘flying columns’ to restore order. There were alaso significant women’s demonstrations [see box below] and the protestors' slogan was: "Long live Saad. … Long live Independence".
800 were killed in suppressing the demonstrations.

On 16 March 1919 several hundred Egyptian women protested against the British occupation. Led by the wives of the exiled Egyptian nationalist politicians, Safia Zaghlul, Mana Fahmi Wissa and Huda Sha‘rawi. The women refused to comply with British orders to disperse.
Following the protests by his supporters Zaglul was permitted to attend the Paris Peace conference. However, in Paris the British were not sympathetic to Zaghlul’s demands and unrest continued in Egypt. In November 1919 the Milner Commission was sent by Britain to redress the crisis. Lord Milner proposed that a Treaty of Alliance be signed to replace the protectorate. British foreign minister Lord Curzon agreed for an Egyptian mission to come to London in June 1920, led by Zaghlul and Adli Pasha. An agreement was concluded in August 1920. However, the agreement broke-down in 1921 as Adli Pasha would not agree to continued British control of the Suez Canal. Britain then imposed martial law when protests erupted.
Nevertheless, in February 1922, the British recognised Egypt as a sovereign state with a constitutional monarchy. The new king was crowned King Fuad and a new constitution was created in 1923. This gave the King the power to appoint a prime minister, dismiss ministers and to dissolve parliament. But, Egyptian independence was curtailed by four specific provisions: Britain would retain control of ‘imperial communications’ which essentially meant it retained control of the Suez canal; Britain could retain troops in Egypt as it was given the right to defend it against an invasion; Britain had the right to defend the rights of minorities and foreigners in Egypt; Britain could determine the status of Sudan. These conditions were unacceptable to nationalists and further revealed the continued weakness of the government.
Although the Wafd independence movement grew after 1922, its influence in Egypt was limited as the King suspended the constitution and ruled by decree with the backing of the British high commissioner. There then developed three key power blocs – the King, the Wafdists and the British. Into this mix, in 1928, a new party began to gain momentum, the Muslim Brotherhood. Founded by the Sheikh of the al-Azhar university of Cairo, Hassan el-Banna, its ideology was nationalist and Islamic. The Muslim Brotherhood advocated the restoration of a Caliphate in Cairo and the waging of a jihad or holy war against British influence.
King Fuad died in 1936 and was succeeded by his nephew Farouk. The death of Fuad had led to demands for a return of government in line with the constitution of 1923, and the Wafd party won the Egyptian elections.
Treaty of Alliance 1936
At the same time, the situation in Europe became increasingly tense and unstable [with the rise of Hitler in 1933 and the Italian invasion of Abyssinia in 1936]; the British decided to negotiate with the Wafdists. The Anglo-Egyptian treaty of 1936, or the ‘Treaty of Alliance’, gave Egypt the right to become a member of the League of Nations and to station its troops in the Sudan; Britain was permitted to retain 10,000 troops in the Canal zone for 20 years.
Nationalists were not satisfied with the terms of the treaty as it allowed the continuation of the British ‘occupation’ of Egypt. The Wafd party was criticised for failing to negotiate an end to British influence and there were protests against the treaty. Among the student protesters was a young Gamal Abdel Nasser. Support for the anti-British stance of the Muslim Brotherhood was strengthened.
Short-term factors
In the post-war period, the Egyptian government called for negotiations for the revision of the 1936 treaty and the evacuation of all remaining British forces. The king and his supporters also called for unification with the Sudan. Britain was not receptive and cited the invasion of Egypt by the Axis powers in 1940 as a key example of why the terms of the treaty were necessary. Large scale demonstrations by nationalists at the Abbas bridge in Cairo in 1946 led to 170 casualties when the police attempted to disperse the crowds. It was within the context of these domestic tensions that negotiations began between Britain and the prime minister Ismail Sidky Pasha. Although it was agreed that British forces were to be withdrawn to the Suez Canal in 1947, nationalist and specifically anti-British sentiments continued to increase.
Task One
ATL: Self-management skills
In pairs consider the role of each of the following in weakening the political system in Egypt and add information from what you have considered above
.png)
3. What were the social divisions that fostered the emergence of authoritarianism in Egypt?
Task One
ATL: Research skills
In small groups research the socio-cultural situation in Egypt between 1882 and 1952. You can use the chart below to focus your lines of inquiry and to organise your research.
Tensions/divisions | Evidence |
Education | Most Egyptian’s were illiterate, with illiteracy rates at 77% in the 1930s. Life expectancy was just 36 years compared to US which was 69 years. |
Religion | |
Role and status of women | |
The Arts | |
Media | |
Immigrants | Under British control and influence the number of immigrants in Egypt grew considerably. The number of foreign nationals in the country rose from around 10,000 in the 1840s to over 1.5 million in the 1930s |
4. How did the impact of war lead to the emergence of Gamal Abdul Nasser’s authoritarian state?
‘[Nasser was] not so much a soldier who went into politics as a politician who went into the army.’
Robert Stephens
There were three key wars which fostered the rise of an authoritarian state in Egypt. In the long-term, the First and Second World Wars had a dramatic impact on the country, but in the short-term the Arab-Israeli War of 1948 created the conditions for Nasser and the Free Officer’s coup of 1952.
Task one: First World War
ATL: Thinking and self-management skills:
In pairs review the long-term political effects of the First World War [as outlined in the previous activities] on Egypt and discuss how each of the following was significant:
- Establishment of the British protectorate
- Wilson’s 14 points
- Wafd delegation & Saad Zaghlul
- ‘Independence’ in 1922 & continued British influence
- Muslim Brotherhood
- 1936 Treaty
The Second World War in Europe broke out in September 1939 when Nazi Germany invaded Poland. The war spread to North Africa in 1940 when Mussolini’s Italy attacked British forces in Egypt. In accordance with the 1936 treaty, Egypt provided facilities for the British. Indeed, Egypt became the base for all British operations in North Africa during the war. The Italian assault was repelled, however the Germans sent reinforcement which forced the British back to El Alamein. After an intense turning point battle at El Alamein beginning in 1942, the German siege was finally broken in 1943. During the conflict many Egyptian nationalists supported the Axis powers in the hope that Germany would finally offer full independence to Egypt and remove British influence. Most nationalists believed that Britain would be defeated.
In 1940 the British pressurised the king to appoint a more pro-British government and remove the prime minister Ali Mahir. Sir Miles Lampson, the British high commissioner, put pressure on King Farouk in 1942, as the Germans were moving to invade, to appoint the pro-British Wafdist al-Nahhas Pasha as prime minister. The government had protested that his appointment, in what became known as the Abdin Palace coup or the 4 February incident, undermined Egyptian independence. The Wafd party then won a landslide victory in the March 1942 elections. However, British interventions had led to the perception of the Wafd Party as mere puppets and had humiliated the King. Egyptian military leaders were appalled (including the young officer Nasser) and General Mohammed Naguib requested permission from the King to resign.
King Farouk was hostile to al-Nahhas whom he dismissed from office in October 1944. His replacement, Ahmed Mahir, acceptable to the British, was assassinated in February 1945.
The Free Officers movement
As a youth, Gamal Abdul Nasser had ambitions to join the army which had only become possible as the 1936 treaty had allowed for the expansion of the military under its own Egyptian officers. Nasser quickly rose up through the ranks and became involved in the Free Officers Movement in 1942. This organisation wanted King Farouk to be more independent of the British. Its stance was targeted at gaining widespread support from the military and the pro-monarchist public.
The movement had a Six Point Plan:
- Eliminate colonialism and the Egyptian ‘traitors’ who supported it
- End the domination of power by the wealthy
- End feudalism
- Establish an equal society
- Develop a powerful army
- Establish democracy and free elections
The first point seemed to echo with the position of both the US and the Soviet Union who, after 1945, both stated opposition to imperialism and the ideological concepts underpinning it. The notion of empire and colonial influence was further undermined by the founding of the United Nations in 1945 as it emphasised human rights, freedom and self-determination.
When the Second World War ended in Europe and north Africa in May 1945, Egypt was deeply unstable. The Wafd party had lost popular support and political opponents then promoted nationalism and called for the revision of the 1936 treaty with Britain. Demands were for the end of British control in the Sudan and the removal of all remaining troops in Egypt. Politics in Egypt was becoming more radical and the Muslim Brotherhood became a mass militant organisation. There were increasing numbers of demonstrations in Cairo which became more violent. Internal tensions hampered the government’s progress in its two key foreign policy aims – to revise the Anglo-Egyptian treaty and to support the Arabs in Palestine. Attempts to negotiate with the British with regards to the former ambition broke down in 1946 as Britain would not rule out independence for the Sudan. The Egyptian government also lost the case after it referred it to the United Nations in July 1947. In the same year an Egyptian communist group was founded, the Democratic Movement for National Liberation [DMNL].
Task One
ATL: Thinking skills
In pairs discuss the impact of the Second World War on domestic politics in Egypt up to 1947. In what ways did it increase nationalism in Egypt?
To what extent do you agree with historian Robert Stephens [1971] assertion that: ‘The king, the Wafd and the British who between them had ruled Egypt for the previous thirty years had now between them made Egypt ungovernable.’
The Arab-Israeli War 1948
In 1947, the British mandate over Palestine was handed to the United Nations. The future of Palestine was discussed at the UN from November 1947 and it was decided that the territory would be divided into an Arab state and a Jewish state with UN control over the holy city of Jerusalem. The UN plan, resolution 181, also called for Britain to allow substantial Jewish migration to the Jewish state by 1 February, 1948; the British had withdrawn by May 1948.
On 14 May, 1948, the head of the Jewish Agency, David Ben-Gurion, proclaimed the establishment of the state of Israel. This proclamation led, almost immediately, to conflict with the Arab League. The Arab League was established in 1945 and it was comprised of six states: Egypt, Transjordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Lebanon
Go to this page and 1. Origins of the state of Israel and complete the tasks under guiding question 5 Why was Israel successful in the 1948 war?
During the Arab-Israeli war of 1948 the Egyptian army was badly led by officers and commanders that often held positions not due to merit but due to familial connections. It was also poorly equipped. The war was a disaster for Egypt which was forced to retreat. But the conflict had given Nasser his first real experience of war. As an anti-imperialist he believed that the Arabs had been defeated because of decisions made by the US, France and Britain – choosing to support Israel – rather than on the battlefield. The war had radicalised the Free Officers Movement which aimed to ‘liberate Egypt’ and it now determined on a plot to seize power in a military coup..
2. What were the short term factors leading to the establishment of an authoritarian state?
Political tension and violence grew in Egypt and when attempts were made to suppress the organisation, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood assassinated the prime minister in 1948. Just two months later the leader of the Brotherhood, Hasan al-Banna was murdered. The Wafd party won the 1950 election, however, political tension continued. The Free Officers Movement had many aims in common with the Wafdists, but wanted tangible action. The Free Officers were outraged by the Tripartite Agreement between the US, Britain and France, which had been agreed after peace talks to prevent another Arab-Israeli war. The agreement committed its members to defend the armistice line and to ban arm sales to Egypt.
In October 1951, after failing to negotiate the removal of British troops, the prime minister abrogated the 1936 treaty. Britain proposed an alternative to the treaty – the Middle East defence organisation [MEDO] – but this was rejected by the Egyptian government as it proposed a four power occupation of the canal zone by US, French, Turkish and British forces instead of the removal of British troops.
The government then pursued a policy of ‘non-cooperation’ with the British and a boycott on the use of Egyptian labour in the Canal zone. Guerrilla attacks by ‘liberation commandos’ on British troops led to retaliation. General Erskine, stationed in Ismailia, ordered tanks to fire on the headquarters of the local police he suspected of supporting the assaults; this was to lead to Black Saturday.
Task One
ATL: Thinking skills
Watch the following video from 3.31 to 22.45. to see what happened as a result of this British action.
This is an excellent docu-drama on the Suez Crisis of 1956; this section gives a good over view of the importance of the Suez Canal, the growing hostility to the British and it includes interesting first hand accounts of 'Black Saturday' by both Egyptians and the British.
- What happened on Black Saturday? Why was this so significant for the position of the British in Egypt?
- How did this situation help lead to the coup carried out by the Free Officers?
Despite the violence of Black Saturday, the British ambassador did not call in the troops for fear of escalating the situation. The King, concerned that his own army had become unreliable, also was slow to react.
As you will have seen from the video Black Saturday was 'the starting gun' of the revolution. Historian Robert Stephens suggests that the army had now become the most important political player in Egypt. The confidence of the Free Officers had been bolstered by the outcome of an election on 6 January 1952 for the president and committee of the army officer’s club in Cairo; the Free Officers' chosen candidate, General Mohammad Naguib, defeated the King’s candidate.
Although the king dismissed his prime minister, there followed three prime ministers who failed to stabilise the political crisis. In preparation for the coup, General Muhammad Naguib was brought into the Free Officers movement as a credible and well known figurehead. Attempts were made to suppress the movement but these failed too and on the 22 July 1952 the coup was executed.
On 23 July the Free Officers took control of the Military General Headquarters and arrested the royalist chief of staff and other commanders. The air force of the Free Officers circled in the sky over Cairo. At 7.30 am a radio broadcast justifying the coup of the ‘Blessed Movement’ was made by Free Officer Anwar Sadat.
Task Two
ATL: Thinking skills
Read through the statement made by Free Officer Anwar Sadat following the coup.
- What is the 'tone' of this statement?
- What reasons are given for why the coup was necessary?
- What does he say the aims of the of the coup will now be?
- What (a) threats (b) reassurances are made in this statement?
‘Egypt has passed through a critical period in her recent history characterized by bribery, mischief, and the absence of governmental stability. All of these were factors that had a large influence on the army. Those who accepted bribes and were thus influenced caused our defeat in the Palestine War [1948]. As for the period following the war, the mischief-making elements have been assisting one another, and traitors have been commanding the army…Accordingly, we have undertaken to clean ourselves up and have appointed to command us men from within the army whom we trust in their ability, their character, and their patriotism. It is certain that all Egypt will meet this news with enthusiasm and will welcome it. As for those whose arrest we saw fit from among men formerly associated with the army, we will not deal harshly with them, but will release them at the appropriate time. I assure the Egyptian people that the entire army today has become capable of operating in the national interest... I take this opportunity to request that the people never permit any traitors to take refuge in deeds of destruction or violence because these are not in the interest of Egypt. Should anyone behave in such ways, he will be dealt with forcefully in a manner such as has not been seen before and his deeds will meet immediately the reward for treason. The army will take charge with the assistance of the police. I assure our foreign brothers that their interests, their personal safety and their property are safe, and that the army considers itself responsible for them. May God grant us success.’
There followed cheering and celebrations on the streets of the capital. The king accepted the request for his abdication in favour of his infant son and left Egypt for exile in Europe. A Regency Council was established to govern until the child was older, but the Revolutionary Command Council [RCC] of the Free Officers movement had the real power and control.
Task One
ATL – Thinking and self-management skills
In pairs read through the chart below and discuss how each of the factors would have facilitated the success of the Free Officers coup in 1952.

What was the role of Nasser’s leadership and the ideology of the Free Officers in facilitating the overthrow of King Farouk?
‘Nasser’s aims [initially] were strictly limited to the eviction of the British. Far from being directed against the throne, his object was… to try to put some stuffing into the king and, by creating a militant opposition to British imperialism within the army, to strengthen Farouk’s resistance to further encroachments on Egypt’s sovereignty.’
Historian Anthony Nutting
The Free Officers movement developed through the 1940s but became a key force in Egypt under the leadership of Gamal Abdel Nasser. Nasser had served in the Sudan during the Second World War and had assisted in the establishment of the secret revolutionary group – the Free Officers movement. He was wounded in action when serving as a major in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. Nasser was a charismatic leader who could command both loyalty and respect from his men. He set up a coordinating committee in 1949, and became its head in 1950. As Nasser had come from a modest background he could promote his understanding of the middle and working classes. It was Nasser that contacted the Muslim Brotherhood and the communist Democratic Movement for National Liberation to gain their backing for the coup. Nasser then led 89 Free Officers in the army coup that deposed King Farouk on 23 July 1952. The new government that was formed, under the figurehead leadership of General Naguib, was a Nasser-led Revolutionary Command Council [RCC]. In 1954, Nasser removed Naguib and declared himself prime minister of Egypt.
Task One
ATL – Thinking and communication skills
In pairs review the material above on Nasser’s leadership and the Six Point Plan manifesto of the Free Officers Movement [see below].
The Six Point Plan:
- Elimination of colonialism and the Egyptian ‘traitors’ that supported it
- End the domination of power by the wealthy
- End feudalism
- Establish an equal society
- Develop a powerful army
- Establish democracy and free elections
With your partner draft the script of an interview with a supporter of the Free Officers movement who is celebrating the success of the coup. The piece should emphasise the role played by the leadership of Nasser and why there is popular support for the ideology / political agenda of the movement.
How did Nasser establish personal control?
At the outset, Naguib had been made prime minister and Nasser his deputy. The new regime then acted quickly on its agenda; on 9 September the Agrarian Reform Law was implemented which seized European owned property [which mainly impacted British assets]. The RCC also set out its land reform program. On 9 December the RCC abrogated the 1923 constitution and in January 1953 the RCC declared a 3-year transition period of its rule. A provisional constitution was drawn up to provide a legal cover of legitimacy. Headed by Nasser, the Liberation Rally, a political organisation, was set up to mobilise pubic support. The RCC proclaimed Egypt a republic on 18 June – abolishing the monarchy and Naguib became president. A ‘revolutionary tribunal’ was established which would put on trial politicians of the old regime.
Subsequently, Nasser manoeuvred himself into political control by the following key steps:

Task One
ATL: Self-management and Thinking skills
Review the factors that helped Nasser become leader of Egypt under the following themes.
Write a paragraph on the significance of each of these themes:
- persuasion/coercion
- the role of the leader
- ideology
- use of force
- propaganda
IB Docs (2) Team